Skip to content

Unrated

CHAIN REACTIONS

(DARK SKY FILMS/EXURBIA FILMS/EXHIBIT A PICTURES/LIGHT BULB FILM DISTRIBUTION (102 minutes; Unrated); 2025)

I’ve always had a fascination with “behind the scenes” stuff about films I like. I’m one of those guys who would pay more for a DVD release if it had interviews with the directors and stars and special “making of” features. In optimal cases, you get fresh insights on favorite movies and it will enhance future viewings. In that light, the full-length documentary CHAIN REACTIONS, about the cultural impact of the horror film THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE, was absolutely revelatory to me. I’ve only seen the film twice in my life – once in the theater and once on an old VHS tape. This doc made me want to see it again as soon as possible, and I will have a million new things to “keep an eye out for” whenever that happens. The film, written and directed by Alexandre O’Philippe, does something I can’t recall seeing with any other similar doc; it’s divided into five chapters in which five artists/directors give detailed analysis of how TTCM personally affected them, and what its enduring cultural significance is. It’s kind of mind-blowing, honestly. We are witnessing the young artist Tobe Hooper looking into the future of America,” says filmmaker Karyn Kusama, one of the chapter narrators. “Hooper is saying, ‘I’m not optimistic about America. But I believe beauty still has a place.’”

If you’re one of those who have an “ICK” reaction at the mere mention of the famed horror film about the chainsaw wielding Leatherface and his demented family, or simply can’t imagine how this grungy, low-budget ‘70s flick could POSSIBLY warrant “serious” cinematic discussion, well, this film may or may not be for you. But I found it to be absolutely riveting in every way, one of the most thorough analyses of a classic horror film ever conceived. You really DON’T have to be a hardcore fan of the movie to appreciate the commentary and insights contained in this doc.

CHAIN REACTIONS (PATTON OSWALT) (screenshot)

Rather unpredictably, the first chapter is a detailed account by comedian/comic actor Patton Oswalt, a no-holds-barred admirer of TTCM, who begins by telling us his first lasting movie memory was one of “terror” after seeing the original NOSFERATU in a theater. We see a clip from one of Oswalt’s stand-up routines in which he talks about the importance of a “good title” for a movie. He says that THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE was the “greatest movie title ever,” letting you know EXACTLY what you’re in for. Oswalt says that the film struck him, visually, as a series of “crime scene photographs,” and addresses how the dumbstruck early audiences were unable to avert their eyes from the carnage on screen. “There is poetry in you not blinking as you watch,” he relates. Oswalt has unabashed admiration for the ways compelling shots accumulate in Hooper’s film and his singular vision for the plot. “There was no negotiating with this family,” he says with regard to the murderous clan who prey on some unfortunate young hippies who wander onto their property by mistake. “The camera is simply observing what happens.” The incongruity of a famous comedian sharing his passion for one of the most disturbing horror films ever made was one of the first things that grabbed me about CHAIN REACTIONS.

CHAIN REACTIONS (TAKASHI MIIKE) (screenshot)

Next up we have the famed Japanese director, Takashi Miike, maker of over a hundred films including the legendary disturbers AUDITION and ICHI THE KILLER. He states with absolute sincerity that TTCM was the first film that made him want to be a director. He goes on at considerable length about the movie’s mesmerizing visuals, boundary-crushing norms and the willingness of director Hooper to explore his dark side. “Up until that point, movies had been somewhat SAFE,” said Miike. But things changed with the story of Leatherface and company. “I think of it as a role model,” the obviously reverent filmmaker says. If you saw TTCM back in the ‘70s, when it created something of an uproar, chances are you’ve tried to forget about ghastly scenes like the character of “Pam” being violently thrust onto a large metal meathook in Leatherface’s slaughterhouse, a wheelchair-bound young man being chainsawed to death (even when we DON’T see any actual blood, something astounding, really), and most notably the prolonged dinner table scene with a bound, repeatedly tormented Marilyn Burns, playing the first “final girl,” Sally Hardesty, in one of the most distinguished and unforgettably convincing SCREAMING roles ever put on film. It is seriously amazing even to this day; I wish I’d had the opportunity to interview her about the nightmarish role (Ms Burns sadly passed away in 2014 at the age of 65). These scenes are discussed often in CHAIN REACTIONS, along with way more detailed analysis of moments of real “beauty” in the film, and the opposing “family dynamics” of the cannibal clan, on the one hand, and the freedom-loving but overly curious and naive hippies on the other hand.

CHAIN REACTIONS (ALEXANDRA HELLER-NICHOLAS) (screenshot)

I find it very hard to be objective about THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE,” says filmmaker Alexandra Heller-Nicholas, an Australian artist and the first of two women to be interviewed for this doc. “It’s a film that you FEEL before you think about it. It’s a very smart film.” Another unabashed admirer, Heller-Nicholas gives a nice summation of the Australian film scene in the ‘70s, talking about how PICNIC AT HANGING ROCK affected her powerfully. We see footage of that noted geographical feature and a few key scenes from Weir’s memorable film. AHN adds some pretty mind-blowing insights at this point, talking about how TTCM is a “home invasion film” from Leatherface’s point of view. “He’s stressed,” she emphasizes. “It’s a very Buster Keaton thing, the way he moves and is fussing over things.”

THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE (MARILYN BURNS) (screenshot)

Next up is the horror master himself, Stephen King, the biggest name to be included here. King states that he didn’t see TTCM when it first came out; for him, the experience came later, when he was a hard-working writer in the early ‘80s. Shots of Kubrick’s THE SHINING are shown; it came out in 1980, and though King was notoriously NOT very pleased with Stanley Kubrick’s cinematic version of his novel, he allows that he loved true horror and that this popular novel was one of the first times he really tried to explore it. And he LOVED what Tobe Hooper did to capture an unprecedented sense of absolute horror onscreen. “It looked fucking REAL,” King declares. He stated that it was an example of a film where “you can’t tell where fact ends and fiction begins.” In a true bit of high praise, he compared Hooper’s opus to the work of Cormac McCarthy in works such as BLOOD MERIDIAN and NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN. He also cited the experience of watching THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT while recovering from a serious injury, at the prompting of his son. That “found footage” classic had elements that truly unnerved King, as the whole of TTCM did. “Both films were made on low budgets with small casts,” he said. “You don’t see too much. It’s all violins.” King made a point of explaining how in horror films, especially, there is often interference from producers before a film comes out. That can water down the impact of a potentially impactful film. “Too many producers wanna give you notes!” he explained. “I HATE the goddamn notes. Tobe Hooper didn’t have to worry about that… He never thought about ‘taste’ and ‘conscience.’” On the matter of whether certain films in this realm can be accused of going too far, King said, “You’re SUPPOSED to go too far! TTCM puts us all in touch with our primal fears. You can’t ever get comfortable watching it. I admire this movie so much!”

CHAIN REACTIONS (KARYN KUSAMA) (screenshot)

By this point in the documentary, you’re somewhat overwhelmed by all the praise, all the flashbacks that are shown (including the memorable shot at the end of TTCM where Leatherface is waving his chainsaw around in unhinged despair as Sally escapes in a pickup truck half-crazed from her nightmare and laughing with relief, a scene the final narrator, Karyn Kusama, calls one of the many “indelible images” in the film. Kusama’s fascination with the movie is perhaps the most impactful of all. She calls the dinner scene with Sally “the scariest, saddest depiction of masculinity that might exist on film… it’s a broken masculinity.” The director repeatedly places TTCM in a broader context, and makes you think, even more than the previous commentators, that the cultural significance of the horror classic has to be acknowledged and appreciated. “I can’t look at Leatherface and feel that he’s simply a monster,” she says. “He’s a part of US.” It’s incredible to see sophisticated filmmakers expressing sympathy for a chainsaw-wielding maniac and his depraved family; Kusama was NOT the only one here to do so. But TTCM’s place in the horror pantheon and all that has occurred since its release in the mid ‘70s have altered the perception of many towards this film, and it now routinely makes the top of many lists of greatest horror films of all time. Kusama calls it “an enduring masterpiece” which states that “America is a madness.”

THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE (MARILYN BURNS) (screenshot)

I couldn’t have imagined when I began watching CHAIN REACTIONS that I would end up placing it in a context that includes the paralyzing division and violence that mark the era we’re all suffering through right now. But that’s the cumulative effect of all the commentary, analysis and deeply felt reactions we’ve just seen in this truly remarkable documentary. Without a doubt it makes you see TTCM in a new light, and how Tobe Hooper’s once controversial cinematic creation can now be seen as the singular, hugely influential piece of celluloid that it is, probably never to be matched again. Director O’Philippe has made a remarkable documentary, one overflowing with insights and the way that art resonates in far-reaching ways that one can never predict. I was stunned by this film, and I’ll be thinking of revelations from it for a long, long time.

SUNRAY: FALLEN SOLDIER

(VERTIGO RELEASING/SUNRISE FILMS/FILM SEEKERS/SUNRAY PRODUCTIONS (116 minutes; Unrated); 2025)

Welcome back to another rousing movie review!

SUNRAY: FALLEN SOLDIER (TIP CULLEN) (promotional still)

Today we will be looking at a British film, SUNRAY: FALLEN SOLDIER, written by James Clarke and Sam Seely and directed by James Clark and Daniel Shepard. Both Clark and Seely are retired British Royal Marines and draw upon their experiences in Afghanistan to lay the groundwork for this thrilling action drama.

SUNRAY: FALLEN SOLDIER (ADAM HARLEY) (promotional still)

Our protagonist, Andy (Irish actor Tip Cullen), has dedicated his life to the military. Upon returning home he attempts to assimilate to civilian life. His marriage has tanked but he still maintains a relationship with his ex-wife and daughter. His days consist of punching a clock as an assistant manager at a small hardware store and visits to his therapist to work through the fog of war. Through a series of unfortunate events, Andy’s beautiful daughter Rachal (Saskia Rose) overdoses on a bad batch of heroin, – not that there is ever a good batch, but you get my drift. The heroin in question is supplied by her boyfriend, Cassius (Daniel Davids), compliments of his super wealthy drug dealing father, Lucian (Kevin Golding.)

SUNRAY: FALLEN SOLDIER (DANIEL DAVIDS) (promotional still)

The movie starts well enough, with Andy and his fellow Royal Marines Smudge, Sledge, Harper, Whiskey 5, and Tango (played by Tom Leigh, Luke Solomon, Steven Blades, Will Bowden, and Nicholas Clark, respectively) dispatching baddies with extreme prejudice while disrupting a major drug deal and searching for those responsible for Rachel’s death. After the opening scene, I expected to watch the stereotypical rage-fueled vengeance movie and truth be, told it did not disappoint. The plot line was fairly predictable with empathetic feelings for our antihero Andy, and his struggles with PTSD. A similar device was used in the classic movie RAMBO. But this movie also brings to light the struggles that many veterans must cope with after returning home from combat, coupled with the lack of mental health services to help them deal with the terror and violence they witnessed.

SUNRAY: FALLEN SOLDIER (TOM LEIGH) (promotional still)

The movie gives you lots of action but also allows you time to catch your breath for a few moments. And those moments are poignant, as Andy reminisces on his failed marriage and his dead daughter and visits his therapist to work through his PTSD. His sessions with the therapist reminded me a lot of Tony Sopranos visits with Doctor Melfi in the HBO series, THE SOPRANOS. (If you haven’t had the pleasure of watching THE SOPRANOS, what are you waiting for? It’s a pretty good series. I mean, what’s not to like? Organized crime violence and a mob boss who is seeing a therapist. You may be disappointed with the ending, but them’s the breaks). Basically SUNRAY… is RAMBO meets THE SOPRANOS with a dash of M Night Shyamalan thrown in.

SUNRAY: FALLEN SOLDIER (TIP CULLEN) (promotional still)

This flick is a bit more than your stereotypical revenge-fueled movie. The ending is completely unexpected. With my first viewing, I was a bit confused and unimpressed, as I didn’t pick up on the subtle clues the writers and directors leave the viewer. On a scale of one-to-ten, my first viewing of SUNRAY: FALLEN SOLDIER was a four. It was entertaining with plenty of action and the common action movie tropes: War heroes coming together to help their captain avenge his daughter’s death, explosions, gunfights, car chases, ambushes and, of course, redemption.

SUNRAY: FALLEN SOLDIER (TIP CULLEN) (promotional still)

Upon a second watch I realized there were clues… very subtle clues. And did I mention a surprise ending? If only they could have captivated me on my first viewing. It’s unfortunate that I had to watch the movie a second time to pick up on some of the subtleties. Some of those subtleties seemed like gaps in the plot or just poorly written scenes; they were not – they were actually clues! Keep that in mind when you view this movie. If I tell you more, I will ruin it for you. Stick with it. If you’re observant, you won’t have to watch it a second time. I give this movie a solid 6½ out of 10. It would have been a little higher had I not felt I needed to watch the movie a second time to realize it was not plot gaps and clunky scenes.

SUNRAY: FALLEN SOLDIER is available now on YouTube TV.

THE BEAST INSIDE

(SEE YOU NEXT TUESDAY FILMS/UNCORK’D ENTERTAINMENT (85 minutes; Unrated); 2024)


THE BEAST INSIDE (also known as THE POSSESSION OF ANNE), directed by Jim Towns, is a chilling exploration of isolation, faith, and the human spirit’s resilience in the face of unrelenting evil. The film follows Anne (producer and Towns’ co-writer Sadie Katz), a woman whose life spirals into a nightmare when she becomes possessed by a demonic entity. As her behavior grows increasingly erratic, those around her, including her boyfriend, Daniel (Anthony Preston), dismiss her pleas for help, leaving Anne to confront the malevolent force alone. Anne’s isolation is compounded by her failed attempts to seek help from traditional and alternative sources. Her visit to Jasmine (Denise Milfort), a Reiki healer, adds an intriguing layer to the narrative, introducing a clash between spiritual healing practices and the undeniable darkness consuming her. Jasmine’s inability to combat the demon highlights Anne’s dire situation and sets the stage for the film’s gripping climax.

THE BEAST INSIDE (SADIE KATZ) (screenshot)

Father Geoffrey (Vernon Wells), a weary priest, becomes a pivotal character as Anne seeks his help. His initial skepticism reflects a broader theme of disbelief that runs through the film, adding a psychological dimension to the horror. Geoffrey’s journey from doubt to belief mirrors Anne’s own struggle, creating a nuanced dynamic that enriches the story. The horror in THE BEAST INSIDE is both psychological and visceral. The film masterfully builds tension through its atmospheric cinematography, which uses shadows, dim lighting, and tight framing to create a sense of claustrophobia and unease. The house where much of the film takes place becomes a foreboding presence, its dark hallways and creaking floors amplifying Anne’s terror. The possession scenes are a standout, blending physical contortions with intense emotional distress. Anne’s self-exorcism is the film’s most harrowing sequence, a raw and brutal confrontation between human and demon. The scene is both physically and emotionally taxing, showcasing Sadie Katz’s powerful performance as she navigates the fine line between fear and determination.

THE BEAST INSIDE (VERNON WELLS) (screenshot)

Horror fans will be pleased with THE BEAST INSIDE’s commitment to delivering genuine scares and a compelling narrative. The film doesn’t rely on cheap jump scares; instead, it builds a slow-burning tension that culminates in a terrifying climax. The use of practical effects enhances the realism of the horror, making the supernatural elements feel immediate and threatening. Moreover, the film pays homage to classic possession horror while injecting fresh twists that keep the story engaging. The exploration of belief, faith, and personal strength adds depth to the horror, making it more than just a tale of demonic possession. It’s a story about a woman fighting to reclaim her agency in a world that refuses to believe her struggle.

THE BEAST INSIDE (SADIE KATZ) (screenshot)

In conclusion, THE BEAST INSIDE is a haunting and well-crafted horror film that offers both scares and substance. With its strong performances, atmospheric direction, and intense climax, it’s a must-watch for horror enthusiasts. Jim Towns has crafted a film that lingers in the mind long after the credits roll, making this movie a standout in the genre.

STREET TRASH

(SCREAMBOX ORIGINAL; NOT THE FUNERAL HOME; CINEVERSE; BLOODY DISGUSTING; VINEGAR SYNDROME; ENIGMA ACE FILMS; PROTAGONIST STUDIOS; STAGE FIVE FILMS(85 minutes; Unrated); 2024)

STREET TRASH, directed by Ryan Kruger (FRIED BARRY), reimagines the 1987 cult classic as a dystopian horror set in a futuristic Cape Town. The story centers on a group of homeless misfits who discover a sinister plan by corrupt Mayor Mostert (Warrick Grier) to eliminate the city’s homeless population using a toxic chemical called “Viper.”

STREET TRASH ( SHURAIGH MEYER, LLOYD MARTINEZ NEWKIRK, JOE VAZ, SEAN CAMERON MICHAEL, DONNA CORMACK-THOMSON, GARY GREEN) (publicity photo)

The film follows Ronald (Sean Cameron Michael), a hardened thief struggling with addiction; Alex (Donna Cormack-Thomson), a resilient street teen; and 2-Bit (Gary Green), whose constant companion is a crude, talking puppet named Sockle. Together, they rise against the oppressive forces threatening their survival. Visually, STREET TRASH delivers a unique blend of neon-soaked aesthetics and grotesque practical effects. Its over-the-top body horror, including melting bodies and gruesome deaths, is both shocking and creatively executed. The chaotic action and wild set pieces add to its midnight-movie charm.

The film’s tone swings between dark satire and outrageous humor, making it an unpredictable ride. While the crude jokes and relentless gore won’t appeal to everyone, fans of splatter horror and cult cinema will likely enjoy its anarchic energy and unapologetic weirdness. Overall, STREET TRASH is a bold, grotesque, and polarizing experience. If you’re into bizarre, gore-filled horror-comedies that push boundaries, this movie delivers a wild, unforgettable ride. STREET TRASH is streaming now on Screambox.

CHILDREN OF THE PINES

(TOPBOX PRODUCTIONS/DAME MEDIA/MIDNIGHT JUSTICE FILMS/FREESTYLE DIGITAL MEDIA (92 minutes; Unrated); 2024)

If a title like CHILDREN OF THE PINES makes you anticipate a horror film about cherubic baddies along the lines of CHILDREN OF THE CORN or CHILDREN OF THE DAMNED, well, that’s understandable. Any cinematic outing that focuses on “Children of, well anywhere or ANYTHING,” is bound to be a less than wholesome look at youngsters that are probably up to no good. But writer/director Joshua Morgan’s nifty little thriller has far more substance than your average horror film, and while it DOES have some horror in it for sure, it’s more properly termed a “dark melodrama” than a straight horror film. And in both its pacing and the deliberate way its script unfolds, this is one cleverly made and genuinely unsettling little film. It kept me very interested, despite my initial low expectations, and that’s saying something.

CHILDREN OF THE PINES (DAVID RAIZOR, DONNA RAE ALLEN) (screenshot)

College girl Riley (Kelly Tappan) has been through some troubling issues with her parents Kathy (Danielle J. Bowman) and John (Richard Cohn-Lee), and is less than enthusiastic about visiting them on a winter break at their home in an unnamed mountain town. In a curious bit of voiceover narration, she tells us “Sadness will only ground you, in ways that happiness can only dream of doing.” Nicely open-ended, that. We quickly learn that the parents have a few secrets, one of which is that they’ve provided employment for Riley’s ex, Gordon (Vas Provatakis). That’s annoying enough for our heroine, who is trying to maintain cordial relations with her former beau. But when it becomes clear that the folks have called upon the services of a cult-like organization that uses, shall we say, “unconventional methods” to facilitate healing for this troubled family, things start to get weird. Especially when some creepy young children are suddenly in the mix, and Riley is supposed to welcome them with “mothering” arms. Where did they come from? And what in the world makes Kathy and John think Riley is gonna be okay with these odd young’uns, one of whom is clearly not quite right in the head? The film’s primary tension comes from how Riley tries to manage each new bit of information thrown at her, and figure out what in hell her parents are up to. And possibly the old beau as well. The film impressively takes its time setting the tableau for this series of events, and while most of us have seen enough disturbing horror films to expect certain lousy things to happen in a story such as this, Joshua Morgan reveals himself to be a thoughtful, psychologically tuned-in kinda filmmaker. Issues of alcoholism, domestic abuse and estrangement are brought up, but nothing is driven to extremes the way you might expect. This is a character drama, one in which you get to observe these folks’ behavior yourself, and try to figure shit out right along with Riley.

CHILDREN OF THE PINES (KELLY TAPPAN) (screenshot)

And let’s talk now about Kelly Tappan’s performance here. Some of the first notes I wrote down while watching this were “terrific acting” and “totally naturalistic scene in the diner,” that being a conversation between Riley and Gordon as they get reacquainted before some of the more disturbing stuff happens. Tappan manages to do something all too rare in movies these days: Convince you that this girl exists and is genuinely like people you might know in her reactions and comments. Without being shrill or over the top, she lets you know she is truly concerned about her family and is trying to figure out what to do. When the moment comes where she has “had enough,” you’re totally with her all the way. It’s a marvelous, nuanced performance by this young actress. Her mom, Bowman’s role, is also impressive although I often wonder WHY a seemingly intelligent, thoughtful woman like this would go along with some clearly deranged behavior from her hubby. But then we KNOW this kinda shit happens today, don’t we?

CHILDREN OF THE PINES (screenshot)

The behavior of the cult that Riley’s parents are being guided by has some serious resonance with stuff we know is going on today, and one of the cult’s reps, the energetically cracked Lorelei (Donna Rae Allen) is believable in a downright icky way. I consider it a small miracle that director Morgan shows so much restraint in this production when he could have cheerfully gone much more over the top. And let it be said that while there IS some shocking violence in the film’s final third, it does NOT go over the top or push the limits. Events stay just on the right side of plausibility, which is disturbing unto itself. And the acting is naturalistic to a fault. The whole cast here impressed me, honestly. And the mountain setting is memorable as well… the film is visually striking, and you absolutely can imagine that all these events are actually happening in this little town. When Riley is walking through a snow-covered pathway, trying not to slip in her little boots, you feel every second of her effort. And you ROOT for her with every step, no doubt about it. That’s testament to Tappan’s anchoring performance, which I won’t soon forget.

I could quibble about the ending, which I wasn’t that wild about, and I sometimes get personally worked up about dysfunctional family dramas, especially when the solutions bad parents seek are clearly bonkers. But there is something genuinely compelling about what writer/director Joshua Morgan has given us here. The degree of realism, the fine acting, and the disciplined script all indicate a filmmaker with loads of promise and the thoughtful nature to look at complex human dilemmas with plenty of empathy and curiosity. CHILDREN OF THE PINES ends up being clearly on the INTELLIGENT side of the horror genre, with a determination to avoid cliches and overused tropes as much as possible. I applaud it for that, and will be interested in whatever Mister Morgan does in the future. Not to mention the charming Ms Tappan.

HEART OF AN OAK (LE CHENE)

(GAUMONT/CAMERA ONE/WINDS/KALEIDOSCOPE ENTERTAINMENT (81 minutes; Unrated); 2022)

There is so much that is rich and wonderful about this French-made nature film that I consider it a miracle that such a film even exists. It’s a “documentary” about the vividness of the natural world that has no narration whatsoever. It has all kinds of creatures scurrying around in its frames but virtually no “cutesy” music to accompany the movement of those creatures (with two minor exceptions). And instead of a panoramic overview of the wonders of Ma Nature that hops from setting to setting, this film focuses on the life within and around a specific tree. Yes, a TREE, in this case a gorgeous 200-plus years old oak tree that serves as the “heart” of the title. Can such a straightforward, unpretentious look at a portion of the natural world make for riveting cinema? Oh, you betcha. This film is a stunner.

HEART OF AN OAK (screen shot)

Although co-directors Laurent Charbonnier and Michel Seydoux obviously had a clear vision of the kind of film they wanted to make, they needed a specially talented cinematographer to zero in on the minute details of this landscape and the critters inhabiting it that would hold an audience’s attention. And they sure found the right guy in Mathieu Giombini, who gives us breathtaking views of insects crawling on leaves, birds huddling together on a high branch or dodging a threat from a watching raptor, red squirrels running to and fro to fetch acorns or do a million other things, and tiny mice in their hidden underground homes, playing, trying to stay warm and watching at every turn for possible danger. Often in nature documentaries, a narrator will tell us what the animals are doing and how remarkable their survival skills are in a possibly unforgiving landscape. There was something so refreshing about watching HEART OF AN OAK and soon realizing there was NOT going to be any narration. Only stunning sequence after stunning sequence, accompanied by mostly subtle, evocative music that is almost always perfect. So we are free, as viewers, to just revel in the colorful and stunning imagery, and let our natural curiosity about, well, all things NATURAL, hold sway. It’s a gift from the amazing French crew that made this movie, and honestly one of the biggest surprises I’ve had as a film buff in a long, long time.

HEART OF AN OAK (screen shot)

The giant oak tree that serves as the primary setting, does not prove to be limiting. We see what is happening in the upper branches of the tree as well as within the roots and below, in addition to the action happening in the general area of the tree, where deer and wild pigs are wandering (not to mention the omnipresent squirrels). We also get to see different seasons and weather conditions, with an extended rain sequence that is incredible. I can’t think of another film in this realm where you see raindrops hitting a patient insect in extreme closeup, or a family of rodents huddling together for warmth half hidden by leaves. There are numerous jaw-dropping sequences, such as a Northern Goshawk trying to make a meal out of a fast-moving Eurasian Jay, zooming after it through the forest like the speeder race on Endor in RETURN OF THE JEDI. I cannot for the life of me comprehend how this segment was filmed. Or how the camera was able to capture a slow-moving Acorn Weevil lumbering along a thin branch, allowing you to study every aspect of this photogenic insect in a way you’ll never get a chance to do in any other forum. And watching competitive mice fight over control of an acorn, like it’s a matter of life and death, conveys natural reality in a far more vivid manner than anything a narrator might say. It is honestly just a genius decision to dispense with narration in this film, meaning that there is no intrusive human voice, save for a somewhat questionable Dean Martin song used to accompany one rather vivid sequence of critters (mostly insects) getting it on and such. It’s sort of comical, I’ll say that. But the overall reaction I had throughout was absolute AWE, at the intense life force happening within and around a magnificent old tree. There are not many films of this “nature” out there, and if you are a lover of the sort of hidden wonders you might sometimes see on a hike in the woods, you’ll adore this movie.

HEART OF AN OAK (screen shot)

The typical action movie will show the names of the stars in the closing credit sequence. I found it absolutely endearing that this film lists the many SPECIES of creatures we see here (yes, I’d been wondering) since they are, truly, the real “stars.” So that includes the aforementioned Acorn Weevil, which deserves some kind of award, the Wood Mouse, the Eurasian Jay, the Great Spotted Woodpecker, the Barn Owl, the Coypu, the badger and many others. The extreme closeups we get of every critter makes for genuinely awe-inspiring views of the secret world we are treated to here. I was never bored; in fact, I felt pure gratitude at the genuinely inspired choices this film makes. It made me even more of a nature lover than I already was. I recommend HEART OF AN OAK with no reservations whatsoever. At a time when we are seeing so much of our natural world destroyed or threatened by climate change. it’s good to have this in-depth, detailed reminder of the powerful mysteries and vital life forms that exist out there closer than we think, wanting only to do their instinctive thing, just as every one of us do every single day. Truly a stunning piece of cinema!

THE GIRL IN THE TRUNK

(SUNRISE FILMS/VERTIGO RELEASING/LONE TOWER VISIONS/A BIGGER BOAT/ROUNOW PRODUCTIONS (90 minutes; Unrated); 2024)

One of the things I love about movies is the chance to experience something from a unique point of view, to live vicariously through a character’s actions, and maybe wonder if you’d behave in a similar manner or completely differently given their challenges in the story. There are so MANY movies out there, of course, that they tend to fall to well-worn tropes of plot development to hold your interest, and that can be tedious. I tend to really like films that show you characters in trapped situations, and to hold your interest by how they build the drama and suspense. A film I reviewed for ZM a couple of years ago was focused entirely on a young pregnant woman trapped in her car on a mountainside in a serious car accident. It was incredibly suspenseful, and when it turned into a horror film in the last half hour, the shocks were well earned. But I’m here right now to talk about THE GIRL IN THE TRUNK, a fairly ingenious little thriller that makes the most of its singular premise. Almost the entire movie consists of the plight and actions of a woman named Amanda Jennings (Katharina Sporrer) who has been kidnapped by an unknown baddie and tossed into the trunk of her rental car. We see a simple shot of her high heel shoes as she unsuccessfully tries to return the car at the film’s beginning, then the furtive actions of a stranger as he quietly gets in that same car without her seeing him. And next we are right in the trunk with her, her hands and mouth taped, trying to figure out what the fuck happened. Amanda has her cell phone, and that becomes absolutely central to the unfolding events. She is wearing a long white wedding dress, and she is a feisty, determined gal who manages to get the tape off her mouth and to call 911 on her phone. The detached sounding male operator asks her a series of increasingly annoying questions, including her location, to which she can only answer “somewhere north of Houston.” When she complains about his questions – after all she can’t give much info being trapped in the trunk of a car – he says “You’re under a lot of stress. but we’re doing all we can.” In the first of many small twists, it turns out the operator is, in fact, her kidnapper, She’s in the trunk and he’s the driver, and their “relationship” is going to evolve through a subsequent series of phone chats.

THE GIRL IN THE TRUNK (KATHARINA SPORRER) (Screen Shot)

So that’s the basic premise, and I gotta say, writer/director Jonas Kvist Jensen does an impressive job of giving us the claustrophobic feeling of being stuck in the trunk of a car, trying to figure out what to do. There isn’t much light, true, but Amanda finds a tool in the trunk that she uses first to poke a hole big enough to see out the back (ingeniously, this allows us to see what happens a few times when the kidnapper stops the car), and later to create an opening through which she can see the driver. In a good example of how cell phones can be used to help move a modern story along, Amanda even manages to snap a photo of her captor, who we’ll soon learn is an ordinary looking, middle-aged white guy named Michael Bellrose (Caspar Phillipson). I don’t think it’s necessary to spill every plot element here, as I think you SHOULD see this movie. But through a series of “games” and tense phone exchanges, we learn that Amanda is a runaway bride, that she and Bellrose have a connection to the same bank, and that getting ahold of her father on the phone turns out to be a key development. Bellrose’s intentions towards Amanda are a bit hazy, but he’s a seriously malevolent dude. When a good samaritan approaches the car offering to help Bellerose with something, the situation goes south in a hurry. And to my knowledge, this is the first cinematic example of a murder being shown to us via a hole in the trunk of a car. Generating even MORE suspense is when our psycho kidnapper tells Amanda she’s going to have company soon, and he slips a scorpion into the trunk through the main opening. This is filmed extremely well, with the critter crawling all over her and her having to maintain the kind of absolute cool that you or I likely would NOT possess. Scenes of this nature in so MANY films can be tiring and insulting to one’s intelligence. Here, it is a marvel of suspenseful pacing, and I wanted to cheer over Amanda’s believable actions. I also loved what happens when a good-natured female police officer stops the car and has a normal-seeming chat with Bellrose. Amanda has to listen to the dialogue without yelling out and risking her life. You’ll THINK you know how this scene is going to turn out, but trust me, you’ll be surprised. Some real thought went into this script and the necessity of getting from “point A” to “point B.” And if you are tired of thrillers and horror films where women either act stupidly or simply act as helpless victims, you’ll enjoy the plucky, sarcastic manner of the heroine here, and how she does her best to one-up the kidnapper mostly through dialogue. At most turns, this film avoids the obvious, which greatly impressed me. And whereas in the typical horror film (and THE GIRL IN THE TRUNK is ostensibly in that category) you’ll have to endure either an unpleasant or simply unbelievable ending, this cool little movie has a solid conclusion, almost cheer-worthy in fact. I found myself amazed at the end, and that doesn’t happen very often.

THE GIRL IN THE TRUNK (CASPAR PHILLIPSON) (Screen Shot)

My only criticism, and it’s basically a small one, is that while Sporrer is clearly a talented actress, her character rarely shows the kind of fear and vulnerability that I would think most women would display in her circumstances. She’s in a clearly desperate situation, and may very well be facing the end of her life, yet she always acts with confidence and resolve. It’s refreshing in a way, but wouldn’t it be more authentic if she lost her cool a couple of times? The “game” that Bellerose keeps her locked into, unwillingly, reveals her to be a more than capable opponent. And Phillipson is definitely a credible baddie, a blandly ordinary creep who insists he is “not really a violent man.” There’s a discernible vulnerability to him that again is somewhat refreshing, and the ongoing dialogue between him and our heroine is fast moving and full of interesting quirks. But overall, this movie is Jensen’s show; he deserves the bulk of the credit for how well this movie works as the writer and director, and I can’t imagine that many other films will be made that so successfully utilize the cramped trunk of a car the way this one does. So thumbs up from me on this surprising little thriller. It’s not flashy, and it’s mostly free of jump scares and the typical bloody violence inherent in this genre. But THE GIRL IN THE TRUNK is a minor miracle, a film that takes one of the most terrifying scenarios any woman could imagine and turns it into something riveting and even thoughtful. This movie beats the odds consistently for films of this nature, and I can only be grateful as a viewer.

HERE FOR BLOOD

(SCREAMBOX ORIGINAL/PAGEMAN PRODUCTIONS/BLOODY DISGUSTING/CINEVERSE (101 minutes; Unrated); 2024)

This is a horror movie that is aptly named, as it indicates that if you watch horror movies in hopes of seeing a lot of blood, this one delivers. Throughout the film, there is spurting blood from stabbings, limbs getting cut off and even a couple of outrageously over the top head choppings. So I am saying all that upfront so you know that bloody violence is the order of the day in this’un. But since it is billed as a “horror/comedy,” the undertone of absurdity and satire helps alleviate any revulsion you may feel about the killings, although I have to say, the first two were really rather shocking… they happen in the film’s first 15 minutes. But what’s it ABOUT, you ask? Well, there’s this wrestler guy named Tom O’Bannon (Shawn Roberts) who makes less than a good living from cheap matches that a sleazy promoter stages for peanuts. Tom isn’t happy about his plight but hasn’t much choice in the matter. His attractive girlfriend Phoebe (Joelle Farrow) has an important test to cram for, and she asks Tom to fill in for just two hours for a babysitting job she agreed to do for friends, who have a young daughter named Grace (Maya Misaljevic). Tom is anything but thrilled about this but reluctantly agrees. Problem is, the house has been targeted for sinister reasons by a band of psycho cultists. When Tom orders a pizza for him and Grace, the pizza delivery guy is slaughtered in brutal fashion, and then it’s abundantly clear something horrible is taking place. And when Tom investigates a couple of weird sounds, the mayhem begins in earnest.

HERE FOR BLOOD (MAYA MISALJEVIC) (Screen Shot)

That’s the setup in a nutshell.

HERE FOR BLOOD (JOELLE FARROW, SHAWN ROBERTS) (Screen Shot)

I don’t really think, in a low-budget horror film such as this, that you need either a detailed plot synopsis or an analytical review of how successful the horror tropes are. Most people watch horror for the visceral kicks a film provides and the overall entertainment value. We’ve seen plenty of films about home invasions by masked psychos, which is the deal here, but this movie seems to delight in a level of excess that definitely makes an impression. One of the dimmer of the psycho cultists, apparently named “Bernie” (Jesse Buck) gets his face held to a red hot stove burner by Tom, screaming his head off; he also gets stabbed a bunch and has a hand cut off. The way Buck screams and pouts angrily throughout is the first sign you should NOT take this movie too seriously. Performance-wise, Buck is over the top but clearly understanding of the TONE that director Daniel Turres is going for. Which is a kind of high-energy schlock-carnage. “We are under attack by a gang of sex perverts!” Tom declares to Phoebe when she finally arrives after her studying is finished. “Everybody grab a knife,” he adds. There are tons of knives in this film, and an axe or two, all utilized regularly. “Just chop!” Tom tells Phoebe when she is wondering how they are going to subdue one of the killers. Phoebe is reluctant at first to do any killing and seems pathetically unhelpful, but when a killer calls her a bad name, she does some chopping all right, to such an extent that Tom has to tell her she can STOP now. Blood spurting in all directions is all the evidence needed that one of the baddies has been taken down. I laughed at that scene, honestly. And I laughed even more when Grace’s parents return home; this seemingly innocuous but neurotic couple, played with sitcom-like dopiness by Tara Spence-Nairn and Michael Therriault, provide some of the meant-for-relief laughter in the film’s final third. Considering the grim nature of the intruders and the detailed butchery we witness, the presence of these two quarreling knuckleheads will either help you relax or annoy the shit out of you. It sort of did BOTH for me.

HERE FOR BLOOD (JOELLE FARROW) (Screen Shot)

The killers are part of a cult, naturally, preparing for some kind of “ascension” that involves both a disemboweled talking head (voiced by Twisted Sister’s Dee Snider) that keeps saying “Feed me!” (a la the plant in LITTLE SHOP OF HORRORS), and the sacrifice of an attractive young woman, which is Phoebe’s intended role in all this and a point of attentive self-awareness and parody by the filmmakers, who score a point or so for that in terms of comedy. “We all knew the risks of joining a cult,” one of the homeowners casually declares. “But it’ll all be okay when we ASCEND.” Of course. That’s how it’s supposed to work! HERE FOR BLOOD is not a boring movie – it keeps things moving along at a good pace, and one or two setpieces of insane bloodletting, though winking at past films like THE EVIL DEAD and REANIMATOR, aren’t quite as deleriously funny as they’d like to be. The acting is not very good, for the most part, although the muscular Shawn Roberts tries to anchor things as best he can (and takes a thorough beating throughout). At one point, young Grace points to a bloody figure on the floor and asks “Is that guy DEAD?” “Yeah,” Tom replies. “Sucks, cause he was a fan of mine, too.” I laughed at that scene, and plenty of others. Clearly the intent was to have some fun with the genre by both the director and writer James Roberts. But it’s no classic, and much of the acting is just too stiff to be memorable. Still, it’s worth a watch for horror fans that like to be repulsed or startled by what they see. And I give the film an extra point or two by letting the good guys win despite going through hell. But many will perhaps NOT make it to the end of this one without a decisive response either yay or nay. But if you’re “here for blood” when you sit down to view this piece of self-aware horror carnage, chances are you will get what you came for.

DAUGHTER

(DARK STAR PICTURES/YELLOW VEIL PICTURES/THIRTEENTH FLOOR PICTURES/ONE WORLD ENTERTAINMENT(96 minutes; Unrated); 2023)

I have a particular fondness for weird and unpredictable movies. So many films these days are by-the-book entries in their respective genres, and anything in the horror/suspense world is more likely than not to give the viewers what they want, more or less. DAUGHTER, a memorable little indie project from writer/director Corey Deshon, is a well-made offering that grabbed my attention right away. It starts with two masked individuals chasing a terrified girl through a bleak landscape, and I think one of the dudes mutters something to the other, after their terrible act, like “Remember, you were responsible for this.” But whether I got that quote right or not, we are soon privy to the terror experienced by a different girl played by Vivien Ngo, as she is being menaced, oddly in a “respectful” manner, by “Father’ (Casper van Dien, best known from STARSHIP TROOPERS, in a career-best performance here). Father is explaining to the girl that she is now part of his family, that she will be addressed as the titular “Daughter,” and that she is badly needed as a companion for “Brother,” played by Ian Alexander. And there is a “Mother” around also, Elyse Dinh. Both the women here are Vietnamese, and this is never explained, though they do use the language to speak to each other, presumably to keep “Father” from understanding their conversations. We have our setup: A cult-like family who think that the “outside” is “poison,” and that safety can only be counted on inside, are fixed on having the right daughter to complete their family, and to bring happiness to their son. Something really weird is going on, and the movie hangs on our suspense about what in hell is happening.

DAUGHTER (IAN ALEXANDER, CASPER VAN DIEN, ELYSE DINH) (photo courtesy DARK STAR PICTURES)

It is worth mentioning the score here, as I believe that music can have a huge role in one’s response to a film. This one was done by David Strother, a composer I don’t know, and it’s a doozy. All tense strings (likely cello and violin/viola) which are often discordant and almost always insistent, but very evocative. They tell us rather straightforwardly that something is really OFF in this scenario, and I think the music is very effective. Deshon made a good choice in utilizing this composer.

DAUGHTER (ELYSE DINH, CASPER VAN DIEN, IAN ALEXANDER) (photo courtesy DARK STAR PICTURES)

It was also a curious and very successful choice to put van Dien in the lead. We’ve seen this actor as an energetic and rather heroic type in past films, and here he is unhinged, spooked (in that way so common to overwrought cult leaders) and singularly set on his one dysfunctional goal: To maintain the semblance of a family and overcome any hesitation on the part of the girl(s) he kidnaps. “This is going to be home for a while,” he tells the scared Daughter. “You have to understand that. You’re part of a family now… I can’t do this without you.” We’ve all read sick news stories about cult kidnappings before, so the grim resonance of this scenario is vividly real. Ngo shows initial reticence and fear, but gradually we see her start to become a bit calculating, and the actress does a credible job starting to “adapt.” She slowly starts to become agreeable, though she is wacked in the face by Father wielding a rolled-up newspaper at one point. She is gingerly trying to push the limits a bit. And while she starts playing with the “Brother,” first at a board game he seems to fancy and then via a “storytelling exercise” that she has to persuade him to engage in (it soon leads to a weird bit of theatricality), Father is suspicious throughout, hovering never far away and making sure both of the “siblings” (as well as we the audience) are kept on edge. He reads periodically from a tattered book (it could be the Bible or some other culty guidebook), and he keeps saying things like “the diseases out there don’t play by the rules!” and issuing warnings like “Don’t you poison that boy!” and “Don’t ruin everything.” The youngster, Ian Alexander, has one of the difficult challenges here: How to show his innocent enthusiasm for “fun” and bonding with his new sibling, and his absolute adherence to Father’s wishes, while clearly getting rattled when something doesn’t seem right. Alexander has a crucial – and a bit inscrutable – role here and he fulfills it well.

DAUGHTER (ELYSE DINH, CASPER VAN DIEN, VIVIEN NGO, IAN ALEXANDER) (photo courtesy DARK STAR PICTURES)

But the film mostly belongs to Casper van Dien. He is entirely believable, quite scary, and a million miles away from his heroic part in STARSHIP TROOPERS. He wears monastic plain clothes (they all do), is clearly disturbed about what he perceives as the sick reality of the outside world, and shows how quickly he might go OFF, and hurt you. He makes it clear early on that if he thinks you DESERVE to be hurt, you WILL be. That keeps you guessing all the way to the end.

DAUGHTER (CASPER VAN DIEN, IAN ALEXANDER) (photo courtesy DARK STAR PICTURES)

It’s remarkable that director Strother keeps sex totally out of the picture here… the reality of most cults I have ever read about is that part of the MO when kidnapping women is to prey on them sexually. That is NOT part of this particular story. Also a surprise was the ending, which I won’t give away. Some things are left hanging, and you’re left knowing mostly, as one of the captioned chapter titles tell us, that you’ve seen “A Story About Sick People.” I found this film scarily resonant and relevant. We live in a world these days where all kinds of predatory creeps, whether motivated by religion or not, force or pressure people to do the things the sickos want, sometimes having to give up their old lives. DAUGHTER does not make everything clear about the reality we are witnessing, and each of the characters ends up representing a separate aspect of life in a dysfunctional (potentially dystopian?) small-scale system. It’s unsettling, unnerving and sometimes quite disturbing. But the decision-making process that went into the production of this offbeat gem of a film was thoughtful and deliberate, and it pays off. Kudos to the director and the acting foursome for serving up something that you’re not likely to forget, and avoiding almost all the clichés of this particular cinematic milieu.

(DAUGHTER premieres in theaters and On Demand on February 10, 2023, with a DVD release scheduled for May 9.)

MURDER AT YELLOWSTONE CITY

(YELLOWSTONE FILM RANCH/RENEGADE ENTERTAINMENT/RLJ ENTERTAINMENT (127 minutes; Unrated); 2022)

If you’ve spent any time here at all, you probably know that I’m a sucker for Westerns – movies (RUSTLERS’ RHAPSODY being my favorite), television series (HAVE GUN – WILL TRAVEL does it for me), comic books, novels and non-fiction. Anything at all that could be deemed a “Western” is pretty much okay in my book. So, when the chance to review a new flick called MURDER AT YELLOWSTONE CITY hit my email, I jumped on it. I was not disappointed!

MURDER AT YELLOWSTONE CITY (ISAIAH MUSTAFA, RICHARD DREYFUSS) (publicity still)

In the opening sequence, there are a few of the familiar “Western” tropes to set the mood and the scene for the rest of the film. There is, of course, the appearance of a stranger in town… a quiet, observant, somewhat moody stranger who quotes Shakespeare. As this stranger (played with brooding intensity by Isaiah Mustafa) approaches Yellowstone City, Montana, he is stopped dead in his tracks (well… his horse’s tracks) by an explosion. That explosion turns out to be a nightmare for the stranger: One Robert Dunnigan (Zach McGowan in a small but integral role, though he does appear more after his death than before) was blowing open a long-closed gold mine and, hitting the mother lode, begins making tracks to his shack in the woods. His ramshackle abode was merely a stopping off place so he could tell his wife, Emma (Scottie Thompson), that he found gold and he was heading to town.

MURDER AT YELLOWSTONE CITY (ZACH MCGOWAN, AIMEE GARCIA, EMMA KENNEY, ISAIAH MUSTAFA) (publicity still)

In town, the preacher, Thaddeus Murphy (Thomas Jane), rings the bell for the Sunday morning call-to-worship. Sheriff James Ambrose (Gabriel Bryne), looking for his son (Nat Wolff), finds him in the saloon (which, apparently, is also the town hotel, brothel and bathhouse). With the help of one of the working women, Isabel (Aimee Garcia), Ambrose rousts Jimmy from a hand of poker and into the church. Shortly after, the stranger rides into town, eyed by every person not inside the house of worship. Looking for a room, he is directed to the saloon, where he recites Shakespeare with one of the saloon owners, Edgar (Richard Dreyfuss), who tells him to be careful because the townfolk don’t understand anything but plain and simple. Inside the church, Pastor Murphy is just beginning his sermon as Mister Dunnigan rides into town, guns blazing, yelling that he’s struck it rich. After buying almost the entire town a round and offering the men jobs at his mine, he heads upstairs for a roll with his favorite girl, Isabel. All the while, the stranger sits in a corner alone, taking everything in. When one of the men demands payment for a past gambling debt, it looks like Robert Dunnigan’s celebration may be short-lived and the stranger’s hand automatically goes to his holster. Cooler heads (and the sheriff’s gun pointed between the gambler’s eyes) prevail and the party continues. Headed home after a hard day’s drinking and carousing, someone takes a potshot at Dunnigan, shooting his horse out from under him; obviously in fear of losing his gold, Dunnigan keeps a rapid-fire string of questions, pleas and bargaining opportunities aimed at his attacker while unloading both of his pistols in the general direction of where the shots came from. Of course, all of this shouting makes it that much easier for his assailant to find him in the dark. Taking aim, the shooter hits poor Robert in the back but, just to make sure he’s done the job, he slits his throat for good measure. Now, once his body is found, the sheriff and his deputies are certain of the killer. I mean, there’s only one new man in town so… it must be him, right? And, of course, the stranger’s refusal to speak and the fact that he had money only added to Sheriff Ambrose’s belief that he had his man.

MURDER AT YELLOWSTONE CITY (ANNA CAMP) (publicity still)

Amidst all of the death and brutality (and there is a LOT!), there are some truly sweet moments in MURDER AT YELLOWSTONE CITY. These mostly involve Pastor Murphy’s wife, Alice (Anna Camp), a woman who takes the “ministering” aspect of Christianity to heart, holding Bible studies with the women of Yellowstone City (including the “working” women of the brothel, holding the meetings at their place of business), visiting the sick and, of course, the stranger in his cell. Another pure soul, Violet Running Horse (Tanaya Beatty), was orphaned when a band of white men burned her family’s village and killed everyone in it; Edgar and his partner, Mickey (John Ales), looking for a better life out west, found the child when they happened upon the carnage, nursed her back to health and raised her. Violet operates the livery stables and is the first person the (as yet nameless) stranger meets. After a short exchange regarding the talismans hanging from the man’s saddle and, naturally, the length of his stay in town, the care of his horse and belongings, as well as where he can get a drink and a room. As mentioned earlier, she points him in the direction of the hotel/saloon. All of this obviously takes place right after Dunnigan disrupts the quiet Sunday morning. The next night, Robert Dunnigan is dead and the stranger is arrested. Violet realizes that he could not have killed Dunnigan because his horse and saddle had not been touched since he left them in her care; unimpressed, Sheriff Ambrose thanks her for the information but tells her that there are other ways for a man to get out of town.

MURDER AT YELLOWSTONE CITY (ISABELLA RUBY) (publicity still)

Aside from Edgar, the next person the stranger speaks to is Alice Murphy. The preacher’s wife, after having told her husband that he may be good at sermonizing but not at ministering, was there to minister to a soul in need. Alice asks the man his name. “Cicero,” is his reply. “Cicero? Like the philosopher?” Cicero explains that it is the name of a character in a play who delivers a speech that he dreams of reciting. He also tells Alice that, as a former slave, he has no family and no family name… he raised himself. The preacher’s wife is the moral compass in Yellowstone City, gently prodding her husband to do the right thing. The same morning that she tells him that she’s going to visit the prisoner, a gunshot rings out. It’s one of Isabel’s (yes… THAT Isabel) charges, an orphan girl named Josephine (or Josie, played by newcomer Isabella Ruby) shooting at cans in the cemetery. Thaddeus says, “It’s Josephine. You know, she could use a little ministering, too.” With a smile and a laugh, Alice tells him “What she could use is a father or… someone like that she could look up to.” Getting the point, the good parson heads out to the graveyard:

“You shouldn’t be shootin’ at graves.”

Ain’t like I’m hittin’ it.”

“You’re tryin’ too hard… you’re waiting for the gunfire. It’s not about the violence.”

“It is violent. It’s a rifle.”

As the preacher tells her to relax and helps her adjust how she’s holding, aiming and firing the weapon, Josie asks, “What do you know about guns?” A question that will be answered later in the film. As she takes aim once more, she actually hits the headstone where she placed her target. “Ain’t there somewhere better around here we can shoot?”

“That man killed my father.”

“Go ahead then.” The next shot hits the can. “Let’s set ‘em up.” It’s one of the sweet moments that make MURDER AT YELLOWSTONE CITY more than your typical Western or “who done it” murder mysteries. The young Miss Ruby has several career-making scenes and Josephine proves to be much more than the Bible quoting young lady we first meet. During the forty minute shootout that ends the story proper, she is wounded and does quite a bit of damage herself.

MURDER AT YELLOWSTONE CITY (JOHN ALES, DANNY BOHNEN, GABRIEL BYRNE, LEW TEMPLE, NAT WOLFF) (publicity still)

Throughout the film, the body count continues to rise… and unfortunately, for the prisoner, the night of the second murder (more throat slitting), the deputy in charge of watching over him is otherwise occupied with one of the ladies from the saloon and, thus occupied, doesn’t hear someone come in and unlock the cell door, allowing the prisoner to “escape.” Of course, sensing that he was being railroaded and, more than likely, headed to the gallows, he took the opportunity to get out of Yellowstone.

MURDER AT YELLOWSTONE CITY (THOMAS JANE) (publicity still)

Dunnigan continues to appear, first stinking up the church before his burial and later, after being disinterred by Murphy, as what could be considered the first case of forensic exploration ever performed; the preacher is now certain that Cicero could not have been Dunnigan’s murderer because the bullet he retrieved from the corpse was not fired from the kind of gun that the stranger uses. Things pick up considerably from that point leading to the already mentioned gunfight. As this is just as much a murder mystery as it is a straight Western, I don’t want to give too much away so… just let me say that MURDER AT YELLOWSTONE CITY reminds me of one of my all-time favorite movies – Western or otherwise – 1968’s FIVE CARD STUD starring Dean Martin, Robert Mitchum and Roddy McDowell. I wholeheartedly recommend this dark, engaging film. A star-filled cast doesn’t hurt its chances of reaching a wider audience than most recent Westerns have enjoyed and a strong script by Eric Belgau and deft genre-wise direction by Richard Gray makes it one of the best films of the year.