Skip to content

Digital On Demand

CHAIN REACTIONS

(DARK SKY FILMS/EXURBIA FILMS/EXHIBIT A PICTURES/LIGHT BULB FILM DISTRIBUTION (102 minutes; Unrated); 2025)

I’ve always had a fascination with “behind the scenes” stuff about films I like. I’m one of those guys who would pay more for a DVD release if it had interviews with the directors and stars and special “making of” features. In optimal cases, you get fresh insights on favorite movies and it will enhance future viewings. In that light, the full-length documentary CHAIN REACTIONS, about the cultural impact of the horror film THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE, was absolutely revelatory to me. I’ve only seen the film twice in my life – once in the theater and once on an old VHS tape. This doc made me want to see it again as soon as possible, and I will have a million new things to “keep an eye out for” whenever that happens. The film, written and directed by Alexandre O’Philippe, does something I can’t recall seeing with any other similar doc; it’s divided into five chapters in which five artists/directors give detailed analysis of how TTCM personally affected them, and what its enduring cultural significance is. It’s kind of mind-blowing, honestly. We are witnessing the young artist Tobe Hooper looking into the future of America,” says filmmaker Karyn Kusama, one of the chapter narrators. “Hooper is saying, ‘I’m not optimistic about America. But I believe beauty still has a place.’”

If you’re one of those who have an “ICK” reaction at the mere mention of the famed horror film about the chainsaw wielding Leatherface and his demented family, or simply can’t imagine how this grungy, low-budget ‘70s flick could POSSIBLY warrant “serious” cinematic discussion, well, this film may or may not be for you. But I found it to be absolutely riveting in every way, one of the most thorough analyses of a classic horror film ever conceived. You really DON’T have to be a hardcore fan of the movie to appreciate the commentary and insights contained in this doc.

CHAIN REACTIONS (PATTON OSWALT) (screenshot)

Rather unpredictably, the first chapter is a detailed account by comedian/comic actor Patton Oswalt, a no-holds-barred admirer of TTCM, who begins by telling us his first lasting movie memory was one of “terror” after seeing the original NOSFERATU in a theater. We see a clip from one of Oswalt’s stand-up routines in which he talks about the importance of a “good title” for a movie. He says that THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE was the “greatest movie title ever,” letting you know EXACTLY what you’re in for. Oswalt says that the film struck him, visually, as a series of “crime scene photographs,” and addresses how the dumbstruck early audiences were unable to avert their eyes from the carnage on screen. “There is poetry in you not blinking as you watch,” he relates. Oswalt has unabashed admiration for the ways compelling shots accumulate in Hooper’s film and his singular vision for the plot. “There was no negotiating with this family,” he says with regard to the murderous clan who prey on some unfortunate young hippies who wander onto their property by mistake. “The camera is simply observing what happens.” The incongruity of a famous comedian sharing his passion for one of the most disturbing horror films ever made was one of the first things that grabbed me about CHAIN REACTIONS.

CHAIN REACTIONS (TAKASHI MIIKE) (screenshot)

Next up we have the famed Japanese director, Takashi Miike, maker of over a hundred films including the legendary disturbers AUDITION and ICHI THE KILLER. He states with absolute sincerity that TTCM was the first film that made him want to be a director. He goes on at considerable length about the movie’s mesmerizing visuals, boundary-crushing norms and the willingness of director Hooper to explore his dark side. “Up until that point, movies had been somewhat SAFE,” said Miike. But things changed with the story of Leatherface and company. “I think of it as a role model,” the obviously reverent filmmaker says. If you saw TTCM back in the ‘70s, when it created something of an uproar, chances are you’ve tried to forget about ghastly scenes like the character of “Pam” being violently thrust onto a large metal meathook in Leatherface’s slaughterhouse, a wheelchair-bound young man being chainsawed to death (even when we DON’T see any actual blood, something astounding, really), and most notably the prolonged dinner table scene with a bound, repeatedly tormented Marilyn Burns, playing the first “final girl,” Sally Hardesty, in one of the most distinguished and unforgettably convincing SCREAMING roles ever put on film. It is seriously amazing even to this day; I wish I’d had the opportunity to interview her about the nightmarish role (Ms Burns sadly passed away in 2014 at the age of 65). These scenes are discussed often in CHAIN REACTIONS, along with way more detailed analysis of moments of real “beauty” in the film, and the opposing “family dynamics” of the cannibal clan, on the one hand, and the freedom-loving but overly curious and naive hippies on the other hand.

CHAIN REACTIONS (ALEXANDRA HELLER-NICHOLAS) (screenshot)

I find it very hard to be objective about THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE,” says filmmaker Alexandra Heller-Nicholas, an Australian artist and the first of two women to be interviewed for this doc. “It’s a film that you FEEL before you think about it. It’s a very smart film.” Another unabashed admirer, Heller-Nicholas gives a nice summation of the Australian film scene in the ‘70s, talking about how PICNIC AT HANGING ROCK affected her powerfully. We see footage of that noted geographical feature and a few key scenes from Weir’s memorable film. AHN adds some pretty mind-blowing insights at this point, talking about how TTCM is a “home invasion film” from Leatherface’s point of view. “He’s stressed,” she emphasizes. “It’s a very Buster Keaton thing, the way he moves and is fussing over things.”

THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE (MARILYN BURNS) (screenshot)

Next up is the horror master himself, Stephen King, the biggest name to be included here. King states that he didn’t see TTCM when it first came out; for him, the experience came later, when he was a hard-working writer in the early ‘80s. Shots of Kubrick’s THE SHINING are shown; it came out in 1980, and though King was notoriously NOT very pleased with Stanley Kubrick’s cinematic version of his novel, he allows that he loved true horror and that this popular novel was one of the first times he really tried to explore it. And he LOVED what Tobe Hooper did to capture an unprecedented sense of absolute horror onscreen. “It looked fucking REAL,” King declares. He stated that it was an example of a film where “you can’t tell where fact ends and fiction begins.” In a true bit of high praise, he compared Hooper’s opus to the work of Cormac McCarthy in works such as BLOOD MERIDIAN and NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN. He also cited the experience of watching THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT while recovering from a serious injury, at the prompting of his son. That “found footage” classic had elements that truly unnerved King, as the whole of TTCM did. “Both films were made on low budgets with small casts,” he said. “You don’t see too much. It’s all violins.” King made a point of explaining how in horror films, especially, there is often interference from producers before a film comes out. That can water down the impact of a potentially impactful film. “Too many producers wanna give you notes!” he explained. “I HATE the goddamn notes. Tobe Hooper didn’t have to worry about that… He never thought about ‘taste’ and ‘conscience.’” On the matter of whether certain films in this realm can be accused of going too far, King said, “You’re SUPPOSED to go too far! TTCM puts us all in touch with our primal fears. You can’t ever get comfortable watching it. I admire this movie so much!”

CHAIN REACTIONS (KARYN KUSAMA) (screenshot)

By this point in the documentary, you’re somewhat overwhelmed by all the praise, all the flashbacks that are shown (including the memorable shot at the end of TTCM where Leatherface is waving his chainsaw around in unhinged despair as Sally escapes in a pickup truck half-crazed from her nightmare and laughing with relief, a scene the final narrator, Karyn Kusama, calls one of the many “indelible images” in the film. Kusama’s fascination with the movie is perhaps the most impactful of all. She calls the dinner scene with Sally “the scariest, saddest depiction of masculinity that might exist on film… it’s a broken masculinity.” The director repeatedly places TTCM in a broader context, and makes you think, even more than the previous commentators, that the cultural significance of the horror classic has to be acknowledged and appreciated. “I can’t look at Leatherface and feel that he’s simply a monster,” she says. “He’s a part of US.” It’s incredible to see sophisticated filmmakers expressing sympathy for a chainsaw-wielding maniac and his depraved family; Kusama was NOT the only one here to do so. But TTCM’s place in the horror pantheon and all that has occurred since its release in the mid ‘70s have altered the perception of many towards this film, and it now routinely makes the top of many lists of greatest horror films of all time. Kusama calls it “an enduring masterpiece” which states that “America is a madness.”

THE TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE (MARILYN BURNS) (screenshot)

I couldn’t have imagined when I began watching CHAIN REACTIONS that I would end up placing it in a context that includes the paralyzing division and violence that mark the era we’re all suffering through right now. But that’s the cumulative effect of all the commentary, analysis and deeply felt reactions we’ve just seen in this truly remarkable documentary. Without a doubt it makes you see TTCM in a new light, and how Tobe Hooper’s once controversial cinematic creation can now be seen as the singular, hugely influential piece of celluloid that it is, probably never to be matched again. Director O’Philippe has made a remarkable documentary, one overflowing with insights and the way that art resonates in far-reaching ways that one can never predict. I was stunned by this film, and I’ll be thinking of revelations from it for a long, long time.

DON’T SAY IT

(WHAT EXIT FILMS/DON’T SAY IT MOVIE, LLC/FILMPOOL FILMS (96 minutes; Unrated); 2024)

Some movies whisk you away with grand gestures and fairy-tale romances. DON’T SAY IT does the opposite – it sits you down at a wobbly diner booth, pours you a cup of coffee, and reminds you that love is just as beautiful in the small, imperfect moments of everyday life.

DON’T SAY IT (RICH GROSSO, JOE PACHECO, PJ MARINO, VICTORIA KELLEHER) (publicity still)

Directed by Stephen Ward, this 2024 romantic dramedy isn’t about dazzling meet-cutes or sweeping declarations. Instead, it follows Pat Leone (Rich Grosso) and Lara Doyle (Victoria Kelleher) – two middle-aged, battle-worn souls trying to navigate life after disappointment. Pat, once a dreamer with ambitions of running his own restaurant, now slings sandwiches at his brother’s deli. Lara, a sharp-witted waitress, has long since traded romance for routine. They meet, they hesitate, they laugh, and – ever so cautiously – they begin to hope.

Love, Served with Extra Cheese.

DON’T SAY IT (RICH GROSSO, VICTORIA KELLEHER) (publicity still)

What makes DON’T SAY IT special is its affection for the messy, unpolished side of romance. Pat woos Lara not with flowers or poetry, but with his signature Italian chicken dish, a secret recipe that somehow tastes better when shared. Their dates aren’t candlelit affairs – they’re impromptu karaoke nights where off-key renditions of ‘80s love songs become the soundtrack of something real. And that’s where the magic lies. This film doesn’t chase perfection; it embraces the awkward, endearing, and deeply human ways people find each other.

DON’T SAY IT (RICH GROSSO) (publicity still)

The supporting cast adds richness without ever stealing the spotlight. Joe Pacheco plays Pat’s no-nonsense brother, embodying the kind of tough love that comes with decades of shared history. Tony Denison as Doctor Michael Bernardi offers sage advice with just enough mischief to keep things interesting. These aren’t just side characters – they feel like people you know, voices from the past nudging Pat and Lara toward happiness.

DON’T SAY IT (VICTORIA KELLEHER) (publicity still)

Music plays a quiet but essential role in DON’T SAY IT. The karaoke scenes aren’t just for laughs; they’re symbolic of the film’s entire message – sometimes, you have to make a fool of yourself to find joy again. And when Lara finally joins in, singing just a little too loudly, you can’t help but root for them both. This film is more than a love story. It’s a reminder that life doesn’t end at 40, 50, or beyond – that dreams can be resurrected, that laughter and love can still surprise you, and that sometimes, the best thing you can do is take the microphone and sing off-key.

DON’T SAY IT (RICH GOSSO, VICTORIA KELLEHER) (publicity still)

If you’re looking for something loud and flashy, this isn’t your movie. But if you want a film that feels like an old friend, warms you from the inside out, and leaves you believing in second chances, then grab a plate of Italian chicken and press play.

GEORGE A ROMERO’S RESIDENT EVIL (TRAILER)

(DARK STAR PICTURES/UNCORK’D ENTERTAINMENT/KEY 13 FILMS/POINT FIVE FILMS/CYFUNO VENTURES (2 minutes; Unrated); 2025)

In 1998, Constantin Film approached legendary director George A Romero to bring the gory, zombie-infested video game RESIDENT EVIL to the big screen. Despite the best efforts of everyone involved, the proposed adaptation never materialized. The story behind the project and what happened has gained mythical status in 25-plus years since its inception. Now, director Brandon Salisbury’s new documentary, GEORGE A ROMERO’S RESIDENT EVIL reveals the hidden history of one of the greatest “what could have been” stories in cinematic horror. The documentary is currently available on digital and On Demand. We hope to have a full review soon, but until then, check out the trailer below.

THE BEAST INSIDE

(SEE YOU NEXT TUESDAY FILMS/UNCORK’D ENTERTAINMENT (85 minutes; Unrated); 2024)


THE BEAST INSIDE (also known as THE POSSESSION OF ANNE), directed by Jim Towns, is a chilling exploration of isolation, faith, and the human spirit’s resilience in the face of unrelenting evil. The film follows Anne (producer and Towns’ co-writer Sadie Katz), a woman whose life spirals into a nightmare when she becomes possessed by a demonic entity. As her behavior grows increasingly erratic, those around her, including her boyfriend, Daniel (Anthony Preston), dismiss her pleas for help, leaving Anne to confront the malevolent force alone. Anne’s isolation is compounded by her failed attempts to seek help from traditional and alternative sources. Her visit to Jasmine (Denise Milfort), a Reiki healer, adds an intriguing layer to the narrative, introducing a clash between spiritual healing practices and the undeniable darkness consuming her. Jasmine’s inability to combat the demon highlights Anne’s dire situation and sets the stage for the film’s gripping climax.

THE BEAST INSIDE (SADIE KATZ) (screenshot)

Father Geoffrey (Vernon Wells), a weary priest, becomes a pivotal character as Anne seeks his help. His initial skepticism reflects a broader theme of disbelief that runs through the film, adding a psychological dimension to the horror. Geoffrey’s journey from doubt to belief mirrors Anne’s own struggle, creating a nuanced dynamic that enriches the story. The horror in THE BEAST INSIDE is both psychological and visceral. The film masterfully builds tension through its atmospheric cinematography, which uses shadows, dim lighting, and tight framing to create a sense of claustrophobia and unease. The house where much of the film takes place becomes a foreboding presence, its dark hallways and creaking floors amplifying Anne’s terror. The possession scenes are a standout, blending physical contortions with intense emotional distress. Anne’s self-exorcism is the film’s most harrowing sequence, a raw and brutal confrontation between human and demon. The scene is both physically and emotionally taxing, showcasing Sadie Katz’s powerful performance as she navigates the fine line between fear and determination.

THE BEAST INSIDE (VERNON WELLS) (screenshot)

Horror fans will be pleased with THE BEAST INSIDE’s commitment to delivering genuine scares and a compelling narrative. The film doesn’t rely on cheap jump scares; instead, it builds a slow-burning tension that culminates in a terrifying climax. The use of practical effects enhances the realism of the horror, making the supernatural elements feel immediate and threatening. Moreover, the film pays homage to classic possession horror while injecting fresh twists that keep the story engaging. The exploration of belief, faith, and personal strength adds depth to the horror, making it more than just a tale of demonic possession. It’s a story about a woman fighting to reclaim her agency in a world that refuses to believe her struggle.

THE BEAST INSIDE (SADIE KATZ) (screenshot)

In conclusion, THE BEAST INSIDE is a haunting and well-crafted horror film that offers both scares and substance. With its strong performances, atmospheric direction, and intense climax, it’s a must-watch for horror enthusiasts. Jim Towns has crafted a film that lingers in the mind long after the credits roll, making this movie a standout in the genre.

FITTING IN

(THE MOVIE PARTNERSHIP/ELEVATION PICTURES/BLUE FOX ENTERTAINMENT/TELEFILM CANADA/WONDALAND PICTURES (106 minutes; Rated R) 2024)

FITTING IN is a coming-of-age comedy-drama that dives into the sensitive yet under-explored topic of reproductive health, sexuality, and self-discovery. The film centers around Lindy, a teenage girl whose world is turned upside down when she’s diagnosed with a reproductive condition (Mayer Rokitansky Küster Hauser or MRKH syndrome) that derails her expectations of what a normal sex life could be. This diagnosis forces Lindy to confront her identity and pushes her to explore unconventional methods to understand her body and desires.

FITTING IN (D’PHARAOH WOON-A-TAI, MADDIE ZIEGLER) (screenshot)

What sets FITTING IN apart is its brave and open approach to topics often considered taboo. Lindy’s journey is one that many might find unfamiliar in cinema, yet it’s handled with both humor and empathy, making the subject matter approachable and relatable. The film skillfully balances moments of comedic relief with deeply emotional scenes as Lindy grapples with her diagnosis and the impact it has on her sense of self-worth and future relationships. The heart of the movie lies in Lindy’s quest for empowerment. Rather than succumbing to societal expectations or limitations imposed by her condition, she embarks on an exploration of her own body and desires, seeking to redefine what a fulfilling life looks like for her. It’s a bold and often humorous look at the lengths we go to understand ourselves, even when faced with obstacles that seem insurmountable.

FITTING IN (EMILY HAMPSHIRE) (screenshot)

Maddie Ziegler shines in the role of Lindy, delivering a performance that captures both the confusion and courage of a young girl navigating unfamiliar terrain. Her portrayal is both vulnerable and strong, making Lindy’s journey feel authentic and deeply human. FITTING IN is not just about a medical condition—it’s about growing up, challenging norms, and redefining what it means to be in control of your own body and choices. It’s a thought-provoking, emotional, and, at times, funny film that will resonate with anyone who has ever felt like they didn’t fit in or had to rewrite their own narrative.

DAUGHTER

(DARK STAR PICTURES/YELLOW VEIL PICTURES/THIRTEENTH FLOOR PICTURES/ONE WORLD ENTERTAINMENT(96 minutes; Unrated); 2023)

I have a particular fondness for weird and unpredictable movies. So many films these days are by-the-book entries in their respective genres, and anything in the horror/suspense world is more likely than not to give the viewers what they want, more or less. DAUGHTER, a memorable little indie project from writer/director Corey Deshon, is a well-made offering that grabbed my attention right away. It starts with two masked individuals chasing a terrified girl through a bleak landscape, and I think one of the dudes mutters something to the other, after their terrible act, like “Remember, you were responsible for this.” But whether I got that quote right or not, we are soon privy to the terror experienced by a different girl played by Vivien Ngo, as she is being menaced, oddly in a “respectful” manner, by “Father’ (Casper van Dien, best known from STARSHIP TROOPERS, in a career-best performance here). Father is explaining to the girl that she is now part of his family, that she will be addressed as the titular “Daughter,” and that she is badly needed as a companion for “Brother,” played by Ian Alexander. And there is a “Mother” around also, Elyse Dinh. Both the women here are Vietnamese, and this is never explained, though they do use the language to speak to each other, presumably to keep “Father” from understanding their conversations. We have our setup: A cult-like family who think that the “outside” is “poison,” and that safety can only be counted on inside, are fixed on having the right daughter to complete their family, and to bring happiness to their son. Something really weird is going on, and the movie hangs on our suspense about what in hell is happening.

DAUGHTER (IAN ALEXANDER, CASPER VAN DIEN, ELYSE DINH) (photo courtesy DARK STAR PICTURES)

It is worth mentioning the score here, as I believe that music can have a huge role in one’s response to a film. This one was done by David Strother, a composer I don’t know, and it’s a doozy. All tense strings (likely cello and violin/viola) which are often discordant and almost always insistent, but very evocative. They tell us rather straightforwardly that something is really OFF in this scenario, and I think the music is very effective. Deshon made a good choice in utilizing this composer.

DAUGHTER (ELYSE DINH, CASPER VAN DIEN, IAN ALEXANDER) (photo courtesy DARK STAR PICTURES)

It was also a curious and very successful choice to put van Dien in the lead. We’ve seen this actor as an energetic and rather heroic type in past films, and here he is unhinged, spooked (in that way so common to overwrought cult leaders) and singularly set on his one dysfunctional goal: To maintain the semblance of a family and overcome any hesitation on the part of the girl(s) he kidnaps. “This is going to be home for a while,” he tells the scared Daughter. “You have to understand that. You’re part of a family now… I can’t do this without you.” We’ve all read sick news stories about cult kidnappings before, so the grim resonance of this scenario is vividly real. Ngo shows initial reticence and fear, but gradually we see her start to become a bit calculating, and the actress does a credible job starting to “adapt.” She slowly starts to become agreeable, though she is wacked in the face by Father wielding a rolled-up newspaper at one point. She is gingerly trying to push the limits a bit. And while she starts playing with the “Brother,” first at a board game he seems to fancy and then via a “storytelling exercise” that she has to persuade him to engage in (it soon leads to a weird bit of theatricality), Father is suspicious throughout, hovering never far away and making sure both of the “siblings” (as well as we the audience) are kept on edge. He reads periodically from a tattered book (it could be the Bible or some other culty guidebook), and he keeps saying things like “the diseases out there don’t play by the rules!” and issuing warnings like “Don’t you poison that boy!” and “Don’t ruin everything.” The youngster, Ian Alexander, has one of the difficult challenges here: How to show his innocent enthusiasm for “fun” and bonding with his new sibling, and his absolute adherence to Father’s wishes, while clearly getting rattled when something doesn’t seem right. Alexander has a crucial – and a bit inscrutable – role here and he fulfills it well.

DAUGHTER (ELYSE DINH, CASPER VAN DIEN, VIVIEN NGO, IAN ALEXANDER) (photo courtesy DARK STAR PICTURES)

But the film mostly belongs to Casper van Dien. He is entirely believable, quite scary, and a million miles away from his heroic part in STARSHIP TROOPERS. He wears monastic plain clothes (they all do), is clearly disturbed about what he perceives as the sick reality of the outside world, and shows how quickly he might go OFF, and hurt you. He makes it clear early on that if he thinks you DESERVE to be hurt, you WILL be. That keeps you guessing all the way to the end.

DAUGHTER (CASPER VAN DIEN, IAN ALEXANDER) (photo courtesy DARK STAR PICTURES)

It’s remarkable that director Strother keeps sex totally out of the picture here… the reality of most cults I have ever read about is that part of the MO when kidnapping women is to prey on them sexually. That is NOT part of this particular story. Also a surprise was the ending, which I won’t give away. Some things are left hanging, and you’re left knowing mostly, as one of the captioned chapter titles tell us, that you’ve seen “A Story About Sick People.” I found this film scarily resonant and relevant. We live in a world these days where all kinds of predatory creeps, whether motivated by religion or not, force or pressure people to do the things the sickos want, sometimes having to give up their old lives. DAUGHTER does not make everything clear about the reality we are witnessing, and each of the characters ends up representing a separate aspect of life in a dysfunctional (potentially dystopian?) small-scale system. It’s unsettling, unnerving and sometimes quite disturbing. But the decision-making process that went into the production of this offbeat gem of a film was thoughtful and deliberate, and it pays off. Kudos to the director and the acting foursome for serving up something that you’re not likely to forget, and avoiding almost all the clichés of this particular cinematic milieu.

(DAUGHTER premieres in theaters and On Demand on February 10, 2023, with a DVD release scheduled for May 9.)

NARRATIVES OF MODERN GENOCIDE

(PASSION RIVER FILMS/TEXAS TECH PUBLIC MEDIA (62 minutes; Unrated); 2021)

The worst action humanity has proven itself capable of is surely what we call genocide. That’s the systematic destruction of a particular group of people usually by government decree, and it’s generally incomprehensible to most of us. The new documentary NARRATIVES OF MODERN GENOCIDE doesn’t add that much new to our understanding of this vile policy, but it’s important nonetheless, especially by focusing primarily on two examples outside the “Holocaust,” which we already have countless films about. Here, director Paul Allen Hunton looks at the Khmer Rouge’s horrifying actions in the latter half of the 1970s, and the massacre of mostly children in Burundi in the early ‘80s. Key survivors of each atrocity are interviewed, and it’s hard to believe they are even here to tell their stories. Sichan Siv, a United States ambassador to the UN in the early 2000s and an author whose books include GOLDEN BONES: AN EXTRAORDINARY JOURNEY FROM HELL IN CAMBODIA TO A NEW LIFE IN AMERICA, guides us through a harrowing look back at the “Killing Fields” he escaped from. He lost 15 members of his family, including his mother, in the horror show that commenced after the Vietnam War ended and a bombing campaign in neighboring Cambodia illegally undertaken by Richard Nixon, gave the rebel group known as the Khmer Rouge an excuse to start organizing their plans.

We were in a situation where you could not really think straight because nobody has ever seen this kind of happening before,” Siv tells us. “Not anywhere in human history. A society that killed their own people!”

NARRATIVES OF MODERN GENOCIDE (SICHAN SIV) (publicity still)

Through simple but effective animations, and even more effective filming done at Tuol Sleng, the infamous and preserved torture prison in Phnom Penh (complete with countless skulls and photos of the actual prisoners killed there), Siv relates, with remarkable calm, how Pol Pot and his well-trained underlings proceeded to wipe out essentially a third of “Kampuchea’s” then population of eight million people. It’s almost impossible to comprehend unless you have the opportunity to visit the sites in Cambodia where the atrocities happened, something that American student Josh Kiser was able to do.

When a lot of people think of genocide, they think of NUMBERS, not the thought process behind the killing,” Kiser relates. “It doesn’t matter if it’s 50,000 people or two million people. If it’s the systematic killing of people… for whatever reason, that’s a genocide.”

We get some useful history of how the end of the Vietnam War gave birth to these nightmarish events, and how the Khmer Rouge wanted to form “an agrarian community… to get rid of all the powerful elites and… take things back to ZERO.” Some of the most powerful insights are provided by Doctor Ron Milam, Director of the Institute for Peace and Conflict Studies at Texas Tech University. He has studied these matters in depth, and almost matter of factly describes how important it is for the reality of genocide to be taught in schools.

NARRATIVES OF MODERN GENOCIDE (publicity still)

It will happen again some place, that’s the point,” Milam says. “We need people to know that it can go this way, that there can be a genocide. Unless you’re taught that, you could fall back into that comfortable way of thinking, that people ‘can’t do this to each other.’ It HAS to be taught. My calculation was always roughly that two percent of the population is psychopathic. Then there are fifteen to twenty percent who are just rascals. They don’t believe in genocide and are not driven by racial hatred. But they see it as a way to make money and be in power. Those people surround the psychopaths and will support them.”

This is obviously tough stuff to watch, and it won’t make viewers comfortable about the state of humanity, especially as we know that smaller genocides are still taking place around the globe. Gilbert Tuhabonye was a popular athlete in Burundi in 1993 when the genocide in neighboring Rwanda (with Hutus targeting their perceived rivals, the Tutsi) spilled over into the smaller country and caused many to be exterminated in cruel ways such as fire, including school children. Tuhabonye himself was tortured and marked for death; he relates that he did NOT think he’d survive, recounting in detail his harrowing escape from murderous pursuers. He is shown at a couple of meetings where he is to speak, being introduced and earning enthusiastic applause, before we learn how lucky he was to even get to this point. And he founded an important entity, the Gazelle Foundation, a non-profit that funds and builds clean water projects in his native Burundi. The sheer hate and determination of groups that are often government-sanctioned (and often the government itself), the underlying reality here, will have you shaking your head. It’s a little too resonant even today, in places like Yemen, Myanmar and parts of Africa. How can humanity hope to understand such a level of hatred?

NARRATIVES OF MODERN GENOCIDE (GILBERT TUHABONYE) (publicity still)

One of the things that genocide requires is the dehumanization of a people,” says Aliza Wong, an Associate Dean at Texas Tech University. “There is a… brainwashing that renders the aggressors to be firm in their commitment that their victims are not human.”

Humans killing other humans en masse, and for the flimsiest of excuses at times, has been going on since early in our history. When you can see exhibits on the subject, as with the Holocaust Museum or the evidence preserved at Tuol Sleng, or hear from survivors who lost loved ones, such as the subjects of this film, the effect is sobering. Though Hunton’s film is barely over an hour in length, and arguably could have provided more background, especially in the Burundi segment, it does a good job of zeroing right in on the primary horrors of its subject, and how escape from genocide appears to be an almost random and unlikely thing due to the thorough efforts of the organized killers. That Siv and Tuhabonye are alive to tell their stories is miraculous, and that they can do so in a tone of voice almost like simply having a hard time finding a parking spot at a crowded store, is just unreal. Sure, one moves on from personal trauma, but THAT level of trauma? Let’s hope none of us are ever in the position to find out what it’s like. This documentary is definitely worth the short time it takes to watch it, and though it won’t put you in a great mood, it’s essential that we all know what politics and war can lead to. Some history we definitely do NOT want to repeat.

NARRATIVES OF MODERN GENOCIDE is available now on DVD and On Demand

PARADISE COVE

(QUIVER DISTRIBUTION/VOLTAGE PICTURES/CRASHING WAVE PRODUCTIONS/SUNSET PICTURES/THUNDER STUDIOS (144 minutes; Unrated); 2021)

I don’t know, sometimes it’s not that complicated. Despite the fact I’ve been watching more movies than usual in the pandemic era and have in general been predisposed to like most of them, I still require an engaging plot and some kind of cinematic ZIP to push my thumb to the UP position. And the little sucker is resisting efforts to do so when it comes to PARADISE COVE, a new Malibu-set thriller directed by Martin Guigui. The only known star in this thing is Mena Suvari, whom I haven’t seen on screen for a long while. It was good to have a new appearance by her as kind of a guide, and she’s decent here as the restless, aching-to-get-pregnant wife of a guy who just took possession of the shell of his late mother’s beach house in Malibu, which needs – let’s just say – a ton of work. The setting is lovely enough, and our young couple, Knox Bannett (Todd Grinnell) and Tracey (Suvari) are shown admiring the view, playing with their tiny dog, and clinking wine glasses together as they discuss how much they want to have a child and Tracey’s apparent difficulty getting pregnant. Knox doesn’t seem too bothered by anything, and assures his wife that everything’s going to work out fine.

PARADISE COVE (TODD GRINNELL) (publicity still)

It’s a jolt, then, to discover that they have a mysterious squatter living below their abode-in-progress. That would be Bree (Kristen Bauer van Straten), a shifty, wild-eyed woman who looks older than her twenty-something age and is more than well-known to the locals, including a bar maid who telegraphs that something may be amiss with this gal, and to Sheriff Garcia (Ruben Garfias), who sees her mostly as a harmless nuisance. Ah, but Bree is more than just a danger in paradise. She is clearly unhinged, manipulative and not receptive in the least to Knox’s efforts to get her to relocate. A bit of background is provided about a tragedy she endured with a young son, and Knox tries to be sympathetic to her. But she’s not the sort to “work out a deal” with him or anything. And she quickly gets on the bad side of Tracey, too, who hardly wants to set aside her preoccupations with pregnancy and finances to deal with this crazy lady. Sparks are gonna fly, you might say. And sharp knives, hammers and coldly barbed insults are also gonna be utilized. That kinda stuff can definitely impinge on the aesthetic beauty of crashing waves and crying seagulls outside the window. A scene of Bree sneaking into the shower with Knox is downright ludicrous, and it’s sort of where I began losing patience with this film. Although Bree is reasonably attractive, I simply did NOT believe Knox would react as he did in this scene, not after what had already happened. In fact, Knox’s less-than-smart decisions throughout the movie detract from the sympathy he might have earned as the central character. He’s not all that bright, slow at putting the big picture together, and less than a truly reassuring husband for poor Tracey. As an actor, Grinnell LOOKS the part of an in-over-his-head husband, and he fits nicely with Suvari’s mostly plaintive, concerned wife. But he’s missing something in the charisma department, and his performance is simply too low-key in these proceedings. By the time a big confrontation occurs, there has not been enough energy built up to give this “thriller” an actual thrill. You just sort of want to get it over with.

PARADISE COVE (MENA SUVARI, TODD GRINNELL) (publicity still)

I will say that the premise is a reasonably interesting one – the list of movies about deranged homeless females in Malibu is a short one, as far as I know. And Bauer van Straten’s is the notable performance here. She’s a character who is not overtly psychopathic… more someone who gets under your skin by being rude and insensitive, and then starts doing increasingly nasty things without warning until you and your new place are in BIG trouble. The character has some compelling moments, and yeah, she’ll likely creep you out plenty. There’s a bit of “Fatal Attraction-lite” about Bree and her doings here.

PARADISE COVE (KRISTIN BAUER VAN STRATEN, TODD GRINNELL) (publicity still)

But ultimately this movie is somewhat of a tiresome watch, despite the scenic setting. Nobody is genuinely likable, the plot pushes at the limits of credibility a bit too often, and Knox and Tracey, while you basically ROOT for them, are kind of a bland, unromantic couple. The film lacks any big or genuinely impactful scenes that would make you invest more deeply in these characters. And as a so-called “thriller,” there’s a paucity in that regard, also, except for one or two sudden moments. Mena Suvari fans might enjoy seeing her in a sizable role like this, and some may find the film an okay diversion. But my stomach felt empty at the end of the movie and so did my brain. Not exactly “Paradise,” in other words, for my cinema-loving self.

PARADISE COVE is available now On Demand.