Skip to content

Buddy Movie

SALLYWOOD

(BUFFALO 8 PRODUCTIONS, SALLYWOOD FILMCO, SNEAK PREVIEW ENTERTAINMENT, WILD BLUEBERRY ENTERTAINMENT (89 minutes; Unrated); 2025)


I’ve been reviewing films for many years now, and as both a dedicated movie lover and someone involved in the arts on multiple levels, I think I am pretty well positioned to appreciate a wide variety of cinematic offerings, from the artsy-fartsy to the low-budget trifles. But it’s rare that a movie can grab my attention in as many different ways as SALLYWOOD did. And I mean very personally. I’m amazed that this film was made, and the timing of my viewing, corresponding with Sally Kirkland’s untimely death at the age of 84, is unbearably sad. It’s impossible to reflect on the film without that affecting every observation.

SALLYWOOD (TYLER STEELMAN, SALLY KIRKLAND) (screenshot)

The plot can be summed up pretty simply: A young writer named Zack (Tyler Steelman) is really inspired by the films of actress Sally Kirkland, especially the 1987 film ANNA, for which Kirkland won a Golden Globe and received her only Oscar nomination. After a bizarrely comical opening describing how a moose shattered the window of his neighborhood video store, Zack explains how Kirkland came to his attention, and he impulsively decides to travel to Hollywood in hopes of learning about her and perhaps meeting her. His parents Joann (an inspired Jennifer Tilly) and Dave (Lenny von Dohlen) would prefer he stay right there in Maine where they live and are perplexed by his ambition. But off the youngster goes on his quest, and it’s a fun thing here that he meets the real Sally Kirkland very quickly, and soon finds himself working for her. “In every humdrum life there is a muse,” Zack tells us in voiceover. “Someone who ignites inspiration.” He makes it clear that Sally is just that for him, and we’re OFF on the farcical and improbable adventures of the ageing actress in her twilight years and the young admirer who wants to help her revive her career any way he can. That’s the setup, and what follows is a bunch of things simultaneously: A riotous satire of what it might take to “make it” in Hollywood; a truly original look at how fleeting fame can be for even a star who was once in the Awards game; a personal story about Kirkland herself; and an imaginative (if exaggerated) tale of a fan getting swept up by one surprise/development after another in his pursuit of a showbiz dream.

SALLYWOOD (SALLY KIRKLAND) (screenshot)

This description can’t really convey the unpredictable scenes that unfold, starting with Zack somehow rooming with a studly Australian director named Tom (Tom Connolly, providing much of the comic heft here) who is shown hanging with two bimbos with dreams of their own named “Bibi” and “Poundcake.” When Zack tells Tom about his interest in Sally, Tom replies “Wasn’t she ‘Hot Lips’ in MASH?” “No, that was Sally Kellerman,” Zack tells him, in a recurring joke that is admittedly pretty funny. Sally Kirkland is in on the whole showbiz joke here and initially hires Zack to be an assistant, assigning him to write her obituary (this is just downright eerie, as though Kirkland was predicting she might not be around much longer). Zack’s first attempt at the assignment falls short and Kirkland nixes it. “Where is my life in all this?” she says. “The amazing men I slept with, my disastrous marriages, the two times I tried to kill myself? Did I mention that I slept with amazing men?” Kirkland tells Zack’s parents in a wildly funny phone call that she regards Zack as “a mystical child of light.” She is shown ruminating over her fading career often, and Zack hopes to perk her up by suggesting she take a part in his roommate’s new low-budget horror film, OUTER SPACE ZOMBIE CHICKS IN PRISON. The satire accelerates rapidly from this point on, but it always contrasts with Kirkland’s truthful asides about her past-her-prime career. “I’ve been in 200 films,” she says at one point. “But I’ve been completely erased.”

SALLYWOOD (SALLY KIRKLAND) (screenshot)

Along with the Zack and Sally storyline, the film intersperses bits of narration and “insight” from fictionalized versions of familiar Hollywood characters: Smug casting agent “Clem” (a never funnier Eric Roberts); divorced movie producers George Corrigan (Keith Carradine) and Kathryn Corrigan (Kay Lenz), all-business and always-busy producer Ned Levitt (an excellent Michael Lerner) and “Venetia Boyd,” a Latino literary agent always looking for an optimal new connection at lavish parties (Maria Conchito Alonso). Everyone is terrific and seems to be having a good time. And the satire always cuts two ways, not only playing on our knowledge of a thousand familiar showbiz tales and gossip columns, but depicting in a painfully honest way how ageing actresses find themselves struggling to land parts. “If you’re over 45, you’re DONE!” says Clem in one scene. Kirkland is a brave and admirable performer throughout, watching old reels of herself on talk shows (such as a notable Arsenio Hall clip showing her at her glamorous peak), trying to appeal to her former love George to help her out (in a memorable, believable scene with veteran actor Carradine), and developing a genuine, touching connection with young actor Steelman (thankfully avoiding any awkward romantic shenanigans). The film is directed by Xaque Gruber, whose real-life tale of meeting and working for Sally Kirkland, the script is mostly based on. Gruber has a sure hand throughout and hardly ever wastes a frame or an opportunity for comic shenanigans, even if the film is over the top at times. But the frequent laughs and original tone in examining Kirkland’s particular career trajectory (and the obvious reality of feeling like an over-the-hill actress despite still having her considerable chops, shown in a spontaneous “audition” scene near the end), can’t help but win you over. The result is a more than memorable look at the foibles of stardom and celebrity wannabe-ITIS.

SALLYWOOD (SALLY KIRKLAND, TYLER STEELMAN) (screenshot)

I said earlier that this movie was quite personal for me. In the late ‘80s and throughout the ‘90s, I ran a memorabilia business for a while and was more than a casual celebrity-watcher. It just happens that Jennifer Tilly, Keith Carradine and Kay Lenz were three second-tier stars I really liked; I was startled to see them here. I had 8”x10” stills of all. And I was also, for a time, an autograph collector and wrote to about 40 or 50 stars I admired hoping to get them to sign a photo for me. Guess who was one of them who DID sign a pic and send it to me? Sally Kirkland. I’ve included it in this piece. Kirkland cared about her fans very much, and though she never repeated the burst of acclaim she got with ANNA, her performance here has plenty to say about both what stars go through in fickle Hollywood and how fans perceive their idols, something I think about often.

SALLYWOOD (SALLY KIRKLAND) (signed publicity photo from the collection of KEVIN RENICK)

Just because the rest of the world forgot about you doesn’t mean I ever would,” Zack tells Sally in a poignant scene near the end. I could list half a dozen stars I myself could say that to, if I looked at the whole of my own celebrity watching/collecting days and imagined myself in a Zack type situation. But that notion aside, I heartily recommend SALLYWOOD as a truly funny, surprising and brisk watch for anyone who thinks about show business and fandom on more than a casual level. It ends up being quite a love letter (and sadly, an EPITAPH) for the gifted Ms Kirkland, who does something in this film very few actors have ever done. Whatever little flaws the film has, its virtues far outweigh them, and I bet most of you will find this film very worthwhile.

GRACIE AND PEDRO: MISSION IMPOSSIBLE

(STORY WARRIOR MEDIA CAPITAL/SECOND CHANCE PRODUCTIONS/POLYCAT ANIMOTION/KALEIDOSCOPE HOME ENTERTAINMENT (87 minutes; Rated PG); 2024)

GRACIE AND PEDRO: MISSION IMPOSSIBLE (also known as PETS TO THE RESCUE in some regions) is a delightful family adventure that puts a fresh spin on the “lost pets” genre. The film follows two mismatched animals – Gracie, a pampered show dog used to the comforts of luxury, and Pedro, a resourceful, street-smart alley cat – as they find themselves stranded in the chaotic city of Las Vegas after being separated from their owners during a cross-country move. The movie skillfully blends humor, heart, and excitement as the unlikely duo embarks on a thrilling journey to reunite with their humans. The film’s visual portrayal of Las Vegas is vibrant and lively, capturing both the glitz of the strip and the more rugged, less glamorous parts of the city. The bustling urban setting becomes an integral part of the story, offering endless challenges and unexpected encounters for the duo. From dodging dangerous traffic to outwitting quirky characters, the city becomes a character in itself, full of unpredictable twists and turns. What sets GRACIE AND PEDRO… apart is the dynamic relationship between the two leads. Gracie, having been spoiled her entire life, is initially out of her depth in the chaotic and gritty world she’s thrust into. Pedro, on the other hand, has always lived on the streets and quickly takes the role of a reluctant guide, showing her how to survive.

GRACIE AND PEDRO: MISSION IMPOSSIBLE (screen capture)

Their differences, while comedic at first, gradually transform into the heart of the film. Gracie’s snobbishness softens as she learns to navigate the world without her usual privileges, and Pedro, despite his tough exterior, begins to reveal a soft spot for his unlikely companion. The film also explores themes of trust, teamwork, and resilience, as Gracie and Pedro face a series of obstacles – from shady characters looking to exploit them to daring escape scenes where their wits are tested. Their journey is peppered with moments of vulnerability, humor, and genuine connection, making their evolving friendship the emotional core of the story. While GRACIE AND PEDRO… follows some familiar beats common in family adventure films – like the classic journey home and the eventual triumph of friendship – the execution is heartfelt, and the character development keeps it engaging. The voice acting adds depth to the characters, with Gracie’s prim and proper tone (courtesy of Claire Alan) clashing amusingly with Pedro’s scrappy, streetwise attitude (provided by Cory Doran). Their banter and growing mutual respect make for many endearing and laugh-out-loud moments. Other voices are provided by a stellar cast of Hollywood’s elite class: Brooke Shields, Danny Trejo, Al Franken, Bill Nighy, Alicia Silverstone, and Susan Sarandon among them.

GRACIE AND PEDRO: MISSION IMPOSSIBLE (screen capture)

Although the plot is somewhat predictable, especially for seasoned viewers of this genre, the film’s vibrant setting, energetic pace, and charming leads make it a thoroughly enjoyable experience. Families and animal lovers alike will appreciate the fun-filled adventure and emotional resonance that the characters of Gracie and Pedro brings to the screen. In the end, GRACIE AND PEDRO: MISSION IMPOSSIBLE is more than just a lighthearted animated romp through Las Vegas; it’s a celebration of the bonds that form when two unlikely individuals come together and face the world. It’s a feel-good, entertaining movie that emphasizes the power of friendship, adaptability, and the courage to find your way home. Oh, and for anyone wondering about a family movie night with this one… have no fear, my young’ns, aged 9, 5 and 3 thoroughly enjoyed it!

HAWK AND REV: VAMPIRE SLAYERS

(RBG FILMS/CLUMSY TIGER PRODUCTIONS/LOADED IMAGE ENTERTAINMENT (85 minutes; Unrated); 2020)

Without a doubt, this is one of the silliest movies I have ever seen. HAWK AND REV: VAMPIRE SLAYERS aims to be a kind of cross between DUMB AND DUMBER and THE LOST BOYS, in that it focuses on two very dim-witted friends, Hawk (Ryan Barton-Grimley) and Rev, his vegan-hippie space cadet counterpart (Ari Schneider) who are sure their town of Santa Muerte, California is being plagued by vampires. They wisecrack about everything, assemble a plan to take on the bloodsuckers that may or may not include the eye patch-wearing tough guy Jasper (Richard Gayler), and find time to parody other, better-known films such as FROM DUSK TILL DAWN. In fact, when former security guard Hawk tries to make a point about predictability to his clueless friend, he rattles off a long list of quotes from classic movies that Rev shows unblinking ignorance of. It’s a preposterous scene, and yet, it did sort of make me chuckle. So did a brief chat about how yes, you can still rent DVDs in some places, and seeing a trio of punk rockers mistaken for vamps (one of whom is a black leather covered gimp in an homage to Tarantino’s PULP FICTION… silent, but shown eating popcorn in one scene). The low-budget movie eases into its absurdity at first, with most of the budget apparently spent on some gory scenes that are over the top a la Monty Python. But by the final half hour, it simply goes all in on complete and total idiocy that, if you’re in the mood for it, will possibly give you giggle fits. The film is like an ego project for some college students making their magnum opus, probably stoned for most of the production. Weirdly, though, the acting is decent in a self-indulgent way, and Barton-Grimley is no newcomer. He’s been in the business for years, and I recognize him from one or two TV projects I can’t recall the names of. He’s obviously having a great time here, sending up every cliche in the world of vampire and crime investigation type films. The two leads are joined by a female writer named Theo (Jana Savage), who comes across as though she were doing little more than helping a couple of pals. And a bit of extreme gore in that last half hour will make college students chuckle, perhaps, but likely won’t be of much interest to anyone else.

HAWK AND REV: VAMPIRE SLAYERS (Ari Schneider, Jana Savage, Ryan Barton-Grimley) (publicity still)

I thought at first of including some of the more comical lines of dialogue in this review, and decided against it. The pace of this film is frenetic, and it wears its willful stupidity proudly, honestly wanting to be a throwback to the ‘80s on almost every level. There is an audience for this kind of movie, just as there was for DUMB AND DUMBER, although that one was art compared to the slim production values of this thing. And yet, its gleeful dedication to a brainless aesthetic is admirable. I DID actually laugh a few times, and once I realized that nothing serious was going to happen and the “stakes” (pun intended) would remain low, I could appreciate the lack of pretension here and the high number of ridiculous scenes. But forget all about stuff you’ve seen before like BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER if you watch this. That Joss Whedon show is like MASTERPIECE THEATRE compared to Hawk and Rev’s exploits. Describing the plot beyond what I’ve already said is pointless. These “vampire slayers” are just wanna-be’s, lug-headed friends whose main purpose is to send up a couple of time-worn genres. They do that moderately well at times, but any expectations at all for this film beyond indulging in some extreme silliness, are likely to result in head shaking and exhaustion. And yikes, it looks like a sequel dealing with werewolves is out there. You gotta be howling mad to make a franchise out of this stuff.